HEGOA

Web 2.0

Instituto de Estudios sobre Desarrollo y Cooperación Internacional

Nazioarteko Lankidetza eta Garapenari Buruzko Ikasketa Institutua

Institute for International Cooperation and Development Studies

Marco Lógico

Teoría general del Marco Lógico

Activity design: 3.3. The Logical Framework Approach, AusAID: Ausguideline, Australia, 2005.

A note on the logframe as a flexible tool: Indicators for Safety, Security and access to justice (SSAJ) , P. Haden, PARC, 2003.

A positive look at Monitoring, Review and Evaluation – International Development experiences affecting Regeneration Work in the UK, Evaluation! - A question of Thought, P. N. Dearden, 2005.

Capacity Assessment of Non-Governmental Development Organisations: Beyond the logical framework approach , F. Van der Velden, Context Internal Cooperation, Contextuals nº 1, Utrecht, 2003.

Enfoque del Marco Lógico como herramienta para planificación y gestión de proyectos orientados por objetivos. Manual de la Agencia de Noruega para la Cooperación para el Desarrollo (NORAD). 2008.

Evaluating Socio Economic Development, SOURCEBOOK 2: Techniques and Tools: Logic models, Evalsed, 2003.

Evaluation Series No.1: The Logical Framework , J. Flores, PARC, 2001.

Introduction to the Logical Framework Approach (LFA) for GEF-financed projects, DSE & Particip GmbH, Alemania, 2000.

Linking project design, annual planning and M&E, Managing for Impact in Rural development: a guide for project M&E, Section 3, IFAD, Roma, 2002

Orientaciones para la aplicación del enfoque del marco lógico: errores frecuentes y sugerencias para evitarlos, M. Gomez Galan, D. Camara, CIDEAL, Madrid, 2003.

The Logical Framework, SECO Logframe Version 1.2, KEK – CDC, 2005.

The Logical Framework Approach, NORAD Handbook for objectives-oriented planning, fourth edition, Noruega, 1999.

The Logical Framework: a list of useful documents, R. Davies, Monitoring and Evaluation News, 2008.

The Logical Framework Approach: A summary of the theory behind the LFA method, K. Örtengren, SIDA, Estocolmo, 2004.

Use of Logical Framework Approach an important tool for successful international co-operation in the fields of education and training, T. Farla, ERI SEE Regional Seminar, Belgrado, 2007.


Gestión Ciclo Proyecto

Aid Delivery Methods. Volume 1: Project Cycle Management Guidelines, Comisión Europea EuropeAid, Bruselas, 2004.

Challenges for Spanish Development Cooperation: Towards an Endogenous Evaluation Model, N-S. Schulz, FOROAOD-FRIDE, 2006.

IOM Project Handbook. International Organization for Migration, Geneva, 2011.

Manual Gestión del ciclo de proyecto, Comisión Europea-EuropeAid, Bruselas, 2001.

The EC project method applied in Romanian Justice sector, 2008 – Dana Rem & Des Gasper


El método ZOPP de la GTZ

GTZ Project management, Powerpoint presentation for IFAD Workshop, GTZ, 2000.

Planificación de proyectos orientada a objetivos (ZOPP), Unidad 04: Estrategia de Desarrollo de la Empresa, GTZ, Eschborn, 1998.

Tools: Interactive Community Planning: ZOPP : Goal Oriented Project Planning, Upgrading Urban Communities: A resource framework, The World Bank Group, 2001.

ZOPP - Objectives-oriented Project Planning, Unit 04: Strategic Corporate Development, GTZ, Eschborn, 1997.


Análisis y críticas del Marco Lógico

A Tool for Project management and people-driven development, Proceedings of the INTRAC and South Research Workshop on LFA and OOIP, INTRAC & SOUTH RESEARCH, Lovaina, 1994.

Capacity Assessment of Non-Governmental Development Organisations: Beyond the logical framework approach, F. Van der Velden, Context Internal Cooperation, Contextuals nº 1, Utrecht, 2003.

Carences et aléas du cadre logique, D. Gasper, ITECO, 2006.

Evaluating the “logical framework approach”- towards learning-oriented development evaluation, D. Gasper, Institute of Social Studies: Working paper series nº 303, La Haya, 1999.

Evaluation Series No.1: The Logical Framework, J. Flores, PARC, 2001.

Evaluations, strategic planning and log-frames – donor-imposed straitjackets on local NGOs?, L. Borstein, ID21, South Africa, 2004.

Is the LogFrame the right tool for managing most NGO work?, R. Davies, BOND Logframe debate 2, 2009.

Lessons learnt from actions co-financed with NGOs, E. Akdag, L.M. Aguilar, CECOFORMA S.A.: Final report for the final seminar, Bangkok, 2005.

Linking project design, annual planning and M&E, Managing for Impact in Rural development: a guide for project M&E, Section 3, IFAD, Roma, 2002

Logical Framework Analysis, adapted in part from Designing Projects and Project Evaluations Using The Logical Framework Approach, B. Jackson, IUCN, 1997.

Logical Frameworks: A critical assessment, managerial theory, pluralistic practice, D. Gasper, Institute of Social Studies: Working paper series nº 264, La Haya, 1997.

Logical Frameworks: problems and potentials, D. Gasper, 2001.

Logframe: A critique, R. Chambers, J. Pettit, Londres,2008.

Lost in the Matrix: The Logframe and the Local Picture, Paper for INTRAC’s 5th Evaluation Conference: Measurement, Management and Accountability? 31st March – 4th April 2003 The Netherlands, L. Earle, INTRAC Research Department, 2002.

Methodological Critique and Indicator Systems, MISEREOR, 2005.

PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IN NONPROFITS: Much to be gained or a waste of resources?, Bachelor Thesis, J. Larsson, J. Kinnunen, Umeå, 2008.

Rediscovering the Logframe?, ONTRAC 37: Rethinking M&E, INTRAC, Oxford, 2007.

The use and abuse of the logical framework approach: A Review of International Development NGOs’ Experiences, O. Bakewell, A. Garbutt, A report from INTRAC for SIDA, 2005.


Estudios críticos del ML

Estudio crítico del Marco Lógico en la CAPV, ECODE, 2011.


Más enlaces:

Variaciones, alternativas y herramientas complementarias al ML

Herramientas vinculadas a gestión de procesos / organizaciones

Herramientas específicas para acción humanitaria

Enfoque Basado en Derechos Humanos

Otros enfoques / Herramientas innovadoras